Introduction
The Army Fitness Test vs ACFT debate matters to every Soldier who trains, tests, and advances in today’s Army. Fitness standards are not just about passing a test. They influence daily training, unit readiness, and long-term career outcomes. When the Army replaced the Army Combat Fitness Test with the Army Fitness Test, the goal was to fix real problems, not lower expectations. Soldiers needed a system that was fair, practical, and consistent across all units, regardless of location or available equipment.
The Army Fitness Test represents a shift toward simpler testing while keeping a strong focus on physical readiness. Compared to the ACFT, the new test reduces complexity, improves scoring clarity, and makes preparation more straightforward. Understanding the key differences between the Army Fitness Test vs ACFT helps Soldiers train smarter, avoid common mistakes, and stay compliant with current standards. This guide breaks down what changed, why it changed, and why it matters for anyone preparing for the next fitness assessment.
What Was the ACFT?
The Army Combat Fitness Test was introduced to better reflect combat readiness. It focused heavily on strength, power, and functional movement.
ACFT events included:
- Three-rep maximum deadlift
- Standing power throw
- Hand-release push-ups
- Sprint-drag-carry
- Plank or leg tuck
- Two-mile run
While the intent was solid, the execution caused issues. Units struggled with equipment demands, testing time, injury concerns, and inconsistent results across different Soldier populations.
What Is the Army Fitness Test (AFT)?
The Army Fitness Test is the Army’s current official fitness assessment. It simplifies testing while maintaining core fitness standards tied to combat readiness.
The AFT focuses on:
- Muscular endurance
- Cardiovascular fitness
- General physical readiness
It reduces logistical strain and improves fairness while remaining relevant to real-world military demands.
Army Fitness Test vs ACFT: Key Differences
The biggest differences come down to simplicity, accessibility, and consistency.
- Fewer specialized events
- Less equipment required
- Easier setup at unit level
- More consistent scoring outcomes
The AFT is designed to be easier to administer without lowering expectations.
Event-by-Event Comparison
| Component | ACFT | Army Fitness Test (AFT) |
|---|---|---|
| Strength | 3-Rep Deadlift | Push-Ups |
| Power | Standing Power Throw | Not included |
| Upper Body | Hand-Release Push-Ups | Standard Push-Ups |
| Agility | Sprint-Drag-Carry | Not included |
| Core | Plank or Leg Tuck | Plank |
| Endurance | 2-Mile Run | 2-Mile Run |
| Equipment Needed | High | Minimal |
| Setup Time | Long | Short |
Scoring System Changes Explained
The ACFT used complex scoring brackets tied to multiple performance tiers. This often confused Soldiers and leaders.
The Army Fitness Test uses a clearer pass-fail structure with standardized expectations. Scoring is easier to understand, track, and enforce across units.
Age and gender considerations remain part of the evaluation, but the system is more transparent and predictable.
Why the Army Replaced the ACFT
Several factors led to the decision:
- Injury rates during strength events
- Equipment costs and shortages
- Testing delays at unit level
- Uneven impact on different Soldier groups
The Army needed a test that worked globally, not just on paper.
According to the official guidance from the U.S. Army, the Army Fitness Test was introduced to improve fairness, consistency, and unit-level testing.
What Stayed the Same
Despite the changes, core priorities did not disappear:
- Emphasis on physical readiness
- Importance of endurance and strength
- Connection between fitness and operational performance
The mission stayed the same. The method improved.
How the Changes Affect Soldiers
For most Soldiers, the AFT means:
- More predictable training plans
- Fewer test-day complications
- Less time spent setting up equipment
- Clearer expectations for passing
New recruits benefit from simpler preparation, while experienced Soldiers gain consistency across testing cycles.
Impact on Army Readiness
At the unit level, the AFT improves:
- Testing efficiency
- Training standardization
- Accountability
- Readiness tracking
Commanders can now focus more on training quality instead of test logistics.
How the AFT Affects Promotion and Retention
Fitness scores remain a critical factor in:
- Performance evaluations
- Promotion eligibility
- Retention decisions
Failing the AFT still has consequences. Passing consistently supports long-term career stability.
How to Prepare for the Army Fitness Test
Training for the AFT should focus on:
- Push-up endurance
- Core strength for the plank
- Aerobic conditioning for the two-mile run
Preparation tips:
- Train 4 to 5 days per week
- Emphasize form over volume
- Practice test-standard movements
- Track progress using a fitness calculator
Using tools on combatfitnessscore.com can help Soldiers monitor readiness and avoid surprises on test day.
FAQs About AFT vs ACFT
Is the ACFT completely discontinued?
Yes. The Army Fitness Test is now the official standard.
Is the AFT easier than the ACFT?
It is simpler, not effortless. Standards still matter.
Can ACFT training still help?
Yes. Strength and conditioning principles still apply.
How often is the AFT conducted?
According to Army fitness policy and unit schedules.
Final Thoughts
The transition from the ACFT to the Army Fitness Test was about practicality, fairness, and consistency. The AFT delivers a sustainable fitness standard without sacrificing readiness.
Soldiers who understand the changes and train smart will have no trouble meeting the standard.